The problem with carbon dating black dating jewish personals site

Posted by / 03-Mar-2016 10:27

0.00003825%), then that object has been dead for about 5700 years.If you find only 1/4th of the C14 in the object, it would have been through 2 half-lifes, and would be approximately 11,400 years old, and so on; however, there are many serious problems with this that are almost Let's say you were going to find a consistent number of grasshoppers in the world -- how would you begin?This is why some really wild numbers have appeared, for example, a freshly killed seal was carbon dated to be 1300 years old, and shells from living snails were carbon dated at 27,000 years old.Evolutionists will argue that these wild dates come from a phenomenon of "old carbon" in the water on the ocean floor, and that's a reasonable argument, but there's a serious logical problem with it that most evolutionists won't consider.Pripyat is the central location where the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident occured in the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic back in 1986.The explosion and nine-day fire sent radioactive isotopes in many directions, and ended up causing incalculable amounts of biological damage and death. It's still highly radioactive today.) So now that we understand how it works, the evolutionist theory for C14 dating states that if you test an object for C14, and it only has about half the amount of C14 known to be in the atmosphere (i.e.If we turned on a garden hose and used that constant rate of water to fill up a barrel, but I drilled holes in the side of the barrel, the hose would begin to fill up the barrel, but as the water got higher, more of it would begin to leak out.At a certain point, the water level would stay in place unless we turn up the rate of water or plugged up the holes.

Let's imagine we walk into a room, a candle is burning on a table, we measure the candle, and find the candle is six inches tall. Not without how tall it was and if it has always burned at the same rate.

Perhaps we can put together the melted wax and find out tall the candle was before it was lit?

Even doing so, we must recognize some wax evaporates with the burning of the candle, irretrievably lost.

It is impossible for a scientists to tell if the samples they are testing have been contaminated from other sources of C14.

Again, it is all based on the C14 in the object being dated is the same as the C14 in the atmosphere when the creature dies, and we have no verification of this whatsoever, but it does help us demonstrate the evolutionists' presupposition, which most are content to continue believing in it despite the logical dissonance.

the problem with carbon dating-3the problem with carbon dating-14the problem with carbon dating-12

Further still, we are To determine the origin of something, we must refer to eye-witness accounts (aka historical evidence) because science is limited on what it can determine.